← Back to home ROI · invisible overhead

What does your team actually spend reviewing pull requests for security?

Most engineering organisations don't have a line item for "PR security review". The hours go into senior engineers' calendars, escalations to a security team, back-and-forth on regulated-data changes — and never roll up. Move the sliders to see your number.

Annualised cost

52-week run rate · before any Osynax discount
What you spend on PR security review today £—
Osynax annual contract £—
Annual saving
£—
Payback period
— weeks
Engineer-weeks reclaimed

How the number is built

Annualised from your weekly inputs above. Every cell updates live.

Annual PR volume
Engineers × PRs/week × 52
Hours / yr · standard review
Volume × review minutes
Hours / yr · escalations
Volume × escalation rate × extra mins
Total annual hours
The number nobody reports on.
Cost · standard review
£—
Standard hours × engineer rate
Cost · escalations
£—
Escalation hours × senior rate
Cost per PR (effective)
£—
Total review cost ÷ PR volume
Equivalent headcount
Total hours ÷ 1,750 working hours / yr
In plain English

Talk to us about a pilot 3-month pilot · £30k + VAT · credit-back on annual conversion
Methodology · assumptions you can change
  1. Working year: 46 weeks of PR-shipping activity (52 weeks minus holiday, training, on-call rotation).
  2. Standard review time is reviewer minutes only — author rework time is excluded so we don't double-count.
  3. Escalations layer on top of the standard review; they don't replace it.
  4. Engineer-weeks reclaimed assumes a 35-hour working week.
  5. Osynax annual contract is modelled at £90k as a published mid-market estimate. Pilot engagements run at £30k for 3 months with credit-back against the annual on conversion. Real pricing depends on repo count, frameworks in scope, and seat count.
  6. Every figure rounds to the nearest hundred pounds for display. Internal calculation is to the penny.